Protection of the Constitution
To: Orange County Sheriff
Cc: Mission Viejo / Aliso Viejo Council members
California Assembly
Governor’s office of the State of California
Congress of the United States
Office of the President of the United States of America
California Assembly
Governor’s office of the State of California
Congress of the United States
Office of the President of the United States of America
Subject: Protection of the
Constitution
Reference: The 2nd Amendment
Reference: The 2nd Amendment
To the Faithful
office of the Honorable Sherriff of California,
You are in the
most precarious position. For your
office stands in a location where it should stand behind the Constitution like
Sherriff Dean Growden in Lassen County or Daivd Hencraft from Tehama
County. But yet, to do so, you would
have to agree that California’s current firearms restrictions are in fact
unconstitutional, and by doing so, would therefore have to admit that any
action the Sherriff’s Department has imposed on citizens by California’s
firearms restrictions, was in fact, an un-Constitutional motion. Perhaps this is the reason why your
department has not yet added your name to the list of more than 30 Sherriff’s
departments around the country that will not impose the illegal actions of the
federal government.
Obviously, I am
opposed to actions that:
1.
Supersede the Constitution. Ignore the Constitution. Change the Constitution. The reality of course, is that government has
no authority to write law around the Constitution. The only way any one can alter the language
of the Constitution is by Amendment. And
I do not see anyone proposing to add an amendment to the Constitution. Instead all branches from Local to Federal,
are simply writing law without respect for the process. Process, as well, is protected by the
Constitution. When someone is prosecuted
against such an illegal law, they are denied not only the right of the
amendment that is being ignored, but ignoring the 5th amendments
responsibility to protect the people (and the Constitution itself). You see, the fifth not only ensures that a
person receives due process, but ensures that the Constitution itself is acted
on and by, due process, therefore laws, are required by the 5th
amendment to be flushed out as valid. Of
course, no one does this, which is sad. Your
offices could be the first protector of this process. The first in the nation to actually put the
Constitution first.
2.
Assume guilt by association
without evidence to support the verdict. The Constitution also, requires, by the 4th,
5th, and 6th amendments that a process of proving guilt
be undertaken. Any law that assumes that a person in
possession of an object is already guilty of a serious potential crime is a
clear violation of most of the Constitution.
For example: The idea that we may only have 10 round magazines assumes
that We The People, are already
guilty of going into a school and shooting innocent children. We are, in effect, sentenced to guilt, without
the actions of due process. It would be insane to say that because a
person possesses a tire iron they must be the type of person that would use it
to smash jewelry cases and therefore should be arrested and prosecuted for
being jewel thieves. No one would dare
to do that, but when it comes to guns, there is no logical explanation as to
the approach, instead emotionalism reigns.
We do not force vehicle manufactures to make cars that only do 70 miles
an hour (the highest speed limit in California) and people are not prosecuted
for driving vehicles that can go faster than 70 miles an hour simply because
they might break the law, especially since vehicle fatalities far outweigh any
other cause of other person involved deaths.
Doing so to firearms shows a lack of intellect and reason and should
embarrass anyone that can think, especially those whom swore to protect the
Constitution and then simply ignored it for local customs.
3.
Allow agencies to decide which
laws are more important.
Let’s face it; you have a hard job.
There are terrible people out there that will in fact do everything they
can to just take what they want from others without regard or concern or
empathy. Sometimes, it is because the
Law Enforcement Officer knows the law so well that they are able to take a bad
guy from the streets, even though it was some minor infraction that allowed
them to get the ball rolling. But the
problem starts when a Law Abiding Citizen is simply made a criminal by
Legislation. This has been proven
directly in recent weeks when a New York assembly member, whom voted against
limiting magazines to 7 rounds, told the assembly that if the law went into
effect he himself would suddenly become a criminal. This is the exact worry our founding fathers
had when it came to the Democratic system and thus, the reason why we are in
fact a Constitutional Republic (that is a free people whom elect officials to Represent us, not rule us). They worried that majorities would simply
create law so that they could dictate policy to the minority. Historically speaking, one need not be a
Rhodes scholar to see how minorities have been treated. It was for this very reason that so many
individual Liberties were safeguarded for each and every citizen in the
Constitution. From my standpoint, the Constitution is the
divine word of this country. It, excuse
the metaphor, comes from on high. It is
the pinnacle of thought, the highest form of logic and from it all other edicts
must stem. Not the other way around (as
is what legislative boards have done).
Local customs do not move up into the Constitution, but instead are
created from the Constitution. Therefore, local agencies should have zero
authority to impose laws that are obviously un-Constitutional.
There is genuine
insurgency beginning in this country between those that would illegally
restrict the amendments of the Constitution and those that possess
firearms. I sincerely hope that nothing
happens, and that the People’s rights remain intact and I hope, and pray for
the safety of all of our Law enforcement officers. I do not envy your position.
I ask, only that
you reflect on what I’ve written and that if you, like me, believe that the
Constitution is the very reason why this country is great, that you tell the
our local administrators and federal employees that we, their bosses, We
The People, disagree with the approach they are taking and that you
will sign up with the other 30 plus Sheriffs to ensure that no illegal laws
are prosecuted in Orange County California.
On a personal
note, as it stands today, I don’t even know if I will continue to live in this
state much longer and am looking at moving myself and my business to a state
that respects the Constitution. To say
I’m angry wouldn’t exactly cover it. I’m
more disappointed and feel like I’ve had to babysit someone else’s children for
the last twenty years, and I’m just tired.
Tired of the rhetoric. Tired of
the lies. Tired of the hate. Tired of the bigotry. Tired of people using fear as a weapon and
saying my guns are more dangerous than their misinformation and cowardice. They forget that words have power and yet
they worry about my guns?
I’m just tired.
Yours, a free
Citizen of the United States of America,
Karry L. Dayton
Comments
Post a Comment