The Libertists

To the Officials in Government, I do not care what your political faction is. I do not care what your social beliefs are. I do not care about your ideology and morals. I care about individualism and self-sovereignty.  Any action forced on a free people is an illegal act no matter if that forcing is done by a King or a State Senate.  It is still a crime.  The forcing of actions against a free people is slavery and enslavement has already seen this country at war twice over.  First the Revolution where we threw off the shackles of a decaying Monocratic ideology and then later when we finally realized that the Constitution guaranteed an already Naturally established set of rights founded on all living things simply by being alive, when we fought and won the Civil War.  In fact, all war for this country has been about the abatement of enslavement by those that have zero love for Liberty and self-sovereignty. It comes down to simply math.  One is either on the side of individual Lib

Part III The 4th Amendment -violated The 4th A  The Text of the 4th Amendment is as follows: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. The point of the 4th A is to ensure that government does not simply start taking the fruits of one's labor, that is, of Life, Liberty, and Estate, they, the government, have no authority to seize your Estate.  Currently, in most heavily Liberal States, the only place one is protected under 4A is in their own home and even then, with particular caveats: if the officer 'sees' a crime then he now has probable cause to enter, detain, arrest, and search, even though what he could have seen as probable cause, underage drinking for example, has noth

Part II The 5th Amendment - Ignored   The 5th A When a law is written, it is done so by a very small group of individuals whom do not have to validate the actual legality of the law they propose to pass.  They do not need to do so, because they represent the law itself, therefore anything they pass is automatically the law, regardless of previous versions or points of contention.   That is just the general legalization of a new law and does not even represent the Constitutional ramifications or worse, and more importantly, the requirements to follow Natural Law.  They simply pass their new law and hand it over to the judicial system, as is.  The judicial system doesn't validate it as legal, moral, constitutional or within the rights created by Natural Law, either.  The Judicial system simply enforces it.  This makes for a very weak interpretation of our three branched system of government, because it leaves the courts not as equal, but separate entities, but instead makes the

Deciding what I can own (in relation to firearms) is a clear violation of the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 5th amendments.  Which in turn means, that it is violates the 9th and the 10th amendments. Part I The First and the Second Amendments -- Violated   1st A Religion is not the idea of believing in a god.  It is the idea of having a belief.  This belief can be anything that does not require the necessity of science to be validated.  Those things that would require scientific peer review are, well, science and require a rigid set of values and processes to follow, whereby the theory becomes fact or falsified.  A belief is anything that one can say and hold onto without the need for this review process.  To say "I believe in God" is to be religious, but it is just as religious to say, "I believe in humanity"  The attributes of the belief may differ but the underlying notion, that is, believing in something that others may disagree with based on their own views,

California is set to vote on AB-187 The body of the bill actually has the audacity to say "This bill would impose a tax upon retailers for the privilege of selling ammunition at the rate of 10% of the gross receipts..." Privilege?  We are privileged to have a business and maintain our own Liberty and exercise our natural freedoms?  You sirs have lost the most fundamental impression of good taste and confused  your positions with those of old world Kings.  You serve for us, We The People, as a privilege to our good fortune, not the other way around. Frankly, I'm insulted that you believe taxation is merely a tool imposed on the privileged used to control them instead of a means to achieve a common goal...like using that tax money to make roads.  Instead you wield it like a weapon, turning it against good people, trying to control and enslave with it.  I hope that you are at least capable of seeing the hypocrisy of using tax as a weapon while you try to tax away the persona