Random Aphorism
** Listening to people argue over this or that ideology is like arguing with the executioner. You're already dead and asking the wrong guy the wrong questions.
** Notice how people use the concept of belief as a measure of reality. For example, "What? You don't believe seatbelt laws make us safer?" Belief has nothing to do with evidence. Besides, the notion of 'safer' is already a concept that such people has lost touch with and cannot even understand what 'safer' actually means. When faced with an epistemology where belief is more valid than a discourse of evidence on the objective universe, one should walk away as quickly as possible. Such a person has no ears to hear only a megaphone to blast the cacophony of their limited metaphysics.
** The vote means that you wish to control the behavior of your neighbor. That you cannot trust his actions of his own accord. You do not trust him. This gives your neighbor the same right to find disgust in your actions. All voting is a moral degradation, a diminishing of intellectual and creative glory. Thus, the reason why it all eventually degenerates to violence.
** Any system that owns a man's movement, be it the sweeping of his hands through the air or his thoughts through the ethers, is slavery. Leaving him no movement or only movement that he must find permission to use; it is the binding of his will. The young mind thinks he can gain back authority through interaction, which he cannot. The middle mind thinks he can run away and not interact, which he cannot. The old mind does one of two things: turns to violence to have his voice heard or he destroys his own soul so as to not be buried by the evil of others.
** As long as violence is a measure of achieving a goal from an entity calling itself a State, that is if the State can make its violent acts moral, then any agency of men, calling themselves a movement (for what is a State but an agency of like minds?) gain the same right to violence as the other entity called State. The measure of the definitions - calling one war and the other terrorism - are but propaganda used to sway minds away from the real issue: that the immoral act is the initiation of force. No one owns the power to hurt others. That in fact, it is only self-defense that is moral.
** Duobus Capitibus Fame Uno Ventrem - If you do not own the authority of your own hunger, who does?
** Slavery is slavery. It matters not if the slave is measured on the color of his skin, the origins of his family tree, or even just by how different his ideas. No man gains power over another, expect by the immoral use of force. No man, even by calling himself a majority, has the authority to force another man to move and act by someone else's views of reality.
** Notice how people use the concept of belief as a measure of reality. For example, "What? You don't believe seatbelt laws make us safer?" Belief has nothing to do with evidence. Besides, the notion of 'safer' is already a concept that such people has lost touch with and cannot even understand what 'safer' actually means. When faced with an epistemology where belief is more valid than a discourse of evidence on the objective universe, one should walk away as quickly as possible. Such a person has no ears to hear only a megaphone to blast the cacophony of their limited metaphysics.
** The vote means that you wish to control the behavior of your neighbor. That you cannot trust his actions of his own accord. You do not trust him. This gives your neighbor the same right to find disgust in your actions. All voting is a moral degradation, a diminishing of intellectual and creative glory. Thus, the reason why it all eventually degenerates to violence.
** Any system that owns a man's movement, be it the sweeping of his hands through the air or his thoughts through the ethers, is slavery. Leaving him no movement or only movement that he must find permission to use; it is the binding of his will. The young mind thinks he can gain back authority through interaction, which he cannot. The middle mind thinks he can run away and not interact, which he cannot. The old mind does one of two things: turns to violence to have his voice heard or he destroys his own soul so as to not be buried by the evil of others.
** As long as violence is a measure of achieving a goal from an entity calling itself a State, that is if the State can make its violent acts moral, then any agency of men, calling themselves a movement (for what is a State but an agency of like minds?) gain the same right to violence as the other entity called State. The measure of the definitions - calling one war and the other terrorism - are but propaganda used to sway minds away from the real issue: that the immoral act is the initiation of force. No one owns the power to hurt others. That in fact, it is only self-defense that is moral.
** Duobus Capitibus Fame Uno Ventrem - If you do not own the authority of your own hunger, who does?
** Slavery is slavery. It matters not if the slave is measured on the color of his skin, the origins of his family tree, or even just by how different his ideas. No man gains power over another, expect by the immoral use of force. No man, even by calling himself a majority, has the authority to force another man to move and act by someone else's views of reality.
Comments
Post a Comment